I don’t buy the “Torey Krug to Detroit” narrative. I simply believe that there will be better “fits” for the 29-year-old defenseman than a rebuilding Red Wings team. I sure as hell don’t believe that Krug would be willing to give any sort of “hometown discount” to a team that’s at least a couple years’ worth of high draft picks and lucky breaks in both free agency and player development away from playoff contention.
I understand that sentimentality is big in hockey, but the only small defenseman who’s headed back to Detroit was Brian Rafalski, and he joined a Red Wings team that was gunning for a Stanley Cup.
All of that being said, the hockey world seems to believe that the Krug-to-Detroit storyline is an inevitability only matched by death and taxes, and Krug’s end-of-season comments to the Boston media were definitely intriguing. The well-spoken Krug readily admitted that he’s probably not coming back to Boston because he wants to maximize his earning power on a long-term, big-money contract, and, perhaps to the disdain of Wings fans, Krug pointed out that he was the longest-tenured Boston athlete without a sports championship ring.
This morning, in his “Quick Shifts,” Sportsnet’s Luke Fox wonders aloud what the salary cap-strapped Bruins will do to their roster to remain championship-viable for a couple of years to come, despite an aging core, and Fox brings up the inevitable angle in the process:
Continue reading More Torey Krug-to-Detroit talk, devil’s advocate style