As far as I’m concerned, the Yzerplan or the lack thereof just ran its natural course.
The GM did his best to build a set of players and young prospects who could compete at a high level–after first having to tear down the remnants of Ken Holland’s late-tenure rebuild.
To some extent, the Wings succeeded in building a big prospect pool. To some extent, the Wings got “close” to the playoffs a couple of times.
They needed better coaching, and it took a few times to get their coaches right.
They needed better players, and the team worked on it, at least, with some successes and some failures.
And the team needed better performances as a collective, and that’s where they struggled, for whatever reason.
I believe that they’ve got the right coaching staff, they’re getting to having the right players thanks to the prospect pool, and that, should they trade Dylan Larkin for good assets, they’re going to at least be building toward a strong roster.
But Yzerman’s managerial style was getting stale, between his stubbornness in terms of hanging onto players and his stubbornness in terms of not being able to sign free agents or re-sign exiting players (the loss of Shayne Gostisbehere strikes me as particularly crippling), so it was just time to make a change.
The Hockey News’s Ryan Lambert is a long-time critic of everything Red Wings-related, so he’s gloating today, and blaming the Wings’ decision to build around a Dylan Larkin that Lambert feels just wasn’t a building block = why the “Yzerplan” failed.
Continue reading The natural order vs. the blame game